All Budget Models Compared
Budget-tier AI models from major providers, ranked by input price.
| Model | Provider | Tier | Input (per 1M) | Output (per 1M) | Context |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GPT-oss 20B | OpenAI | Budget | $0.08 | $0.35 | 128K |
| Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Budget | $0.10 | $0.40 | 1M | |
| Mistral Small 4 | Mistral | Budget | $0.10 | $0.30 | 128K |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | DeepSeek | Budget | $0.14 | $0.28 | 1M |
| GPT-5.4 nano | OpenAI | Budget | $0.20 | $1.25 | 400K |
| Llama 4 Maverick | Budget | $0.27 | $0.85 | 1M | |
| DeepSeek V4 Pro | DeepSeek | Budget | $0.435 | $0.87 | 1M |
| Gemini 3 Flash | Budget | $0.50 | $3.00 | 1M | |
| GPT-5.4 mini | OpenAI | Budget | $0.75 | $4.50 | 400K |
Calculate Your Exact Costs
Pick your models, enter your usage, see how much you'd save with DeepSeek V4 Flash.
Which Should You Choose?
Chatbot / Customer Support
High volume, short responses. Cost per message matters most. Both models handle conversational AI well.
Code Generation
Complex reasoning, longer outputs. Quality and accuracy matter. Both handle coding tasks well.
Long Document Analysis
Processing large documents, legal contracts, or codebases. Context window is critical.
High-Volume Data Processing
Processing large datasets, extracting structured data, or running batch operations at scale.
Google Cloud Ecosystem
Already using Google Cloud, Vertex AI, or integrated Google tooling. Switching has friction.
Structured Output
JSON mode, function calling, and structured data extraction. Both handle this well.
Save More with APIpulse
Get personalized cost optimization recommendations for your specific workload.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is DeepSeek V4 Flash cheaper than Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite?
Yes, DeepSeek V4 Flash is dramatically cheaper. It costs $0.14/$0.28 per 1M tokens while Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite costs $0.25/$1.50. That's 44% cheaper on input and 81% cheaper on output. At 1M tokens/month, DeepSeek V4 Flash costs $0.42 vs Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite's $1.75 — saving $1.33/month.
How much can I save switching from Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite to DeepSeek V4 Flash?
You can save up to 75%+ on your AI API costs by switching to DeepSeek V4 Flash. Input tokens are 44% cheaper ($0.14 vs $0.25) and output tokens are 81% cheaper ($0.28 vs $1.50). For a typical workload of 1M input + 500K output tokens per month, you'd save about $1.33/month — that's a 76% reduction.
Is DeepSeek V4 Flash good enough for production?
Yes, DeepSeek V4 Flash is production-ready and widely used for chatbots, code generation, and data processing. It handles most standard tasks well at a fraction of the cost. While Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite may have Google ecosystem benefits, DeepSeek V4 Flash is the best value for production workloads that prioritize cost efficiency.
Do DeepSeek V4 Flash and Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite have the same context window?
Yes, both models have a 1M token context window. This means context length is not a differentiating factor between these two models. Both are excellent for long document analysis, large codebases, and complex multi-step reasoning tasks.
Should I use DeepSeek V4 Flash or Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite for my chatbot?
For most chatbot use cases, DeepSeek V4 Flash is the better choice. It's 44% cheaper on input and 81% cheaper on output, which matters a lot at scale. It handles conversational AI, customer support, and FAQ-style queries well. Choose Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite only if you need Google ecosystem integration or specific Google Cloud features.
Related Comparisons
All Tools Are Free
No signup required to 67-model comparison, migration code snippets, PDF reports, price alerts, and cost monitoring. ✅ All tools free.
Free Tools →