Google
Gemini 3.5 Flash
$0.00
per month
Input cost
Output cost
Cost per request
Requests/month
OpenAI
GPT-5 mini
$0.00
per month
Input cost
Output cost
Cost per request
Requests/month

Other Budget Models

DeepSeek V4 Flash
DeepSeek
$0.07 / $0.27 per 1M
1M context
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Google
$0.075 / $0.30 per 1M
1M context
Llama 4 Scout
Meta
$0.08 / $0.30 per 1M
1M context

Which Budget Model for Which Use Case?

High-Volume Chatbot

Customer-facing chatbot with thousands of daily requests. GPT-5 mini's 83% cheaper input pricing makes a huge difference at scale.

Better value: GPT-5 mini

Long Document Processing

Processing documents over 272K tokens — legal contracts, research papers, codebases. Only Gemini 3.5 Flash's 1M context handles this.

Only option: Gemini 3.5 Flash

Code Assistant

AI-powered coding help, code review, refactoring. Both models are strong. GPT-5 mini offers better cost per request for high-volume use.

Better value: GPT-5 mini | Long codebases: Gemini 3.5 Flash

Content Generation

Blog posts, marketing copy, product descriptions. Both handle this well. GPT-5 mini at $0.25/$2 vs Gemini 3.5 Flash at $1.50/$9 — GPT-5 mini is 83% cheaper on input.

Better value: GPT-5 mini

Building on a budget?

APIpulse lets you compare all 88 models, save scenarios, and find the cheapest option for your exact usage pattern.

88 models across 10 providers
Save up to 10 scenarios
Export PDF cost reports
Optimize — save up to 40%
Free Tools →

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Gemini 3.5 Flash cheaper than GPT-5 mini?

Yes, Gemini 3.5 Flash is significantly cheaper. Gemini 3.5 Flash costs $1.50/M input and $9/M output, while GPT-5 mini costs $0.25/M input and $2/M output. GPT-5 mini is 83% cheaper on input tokens and 78% cheaper on output tokens.

Which has a larger context window?

Gemini 3.5 Flash has a much larger context window at 1M tokens compared to GPT-5 mini's 272K tokens. If your use case involves processing very long documents or extended conversations, Gemini 3.5 Flash gives you 3.7x more context.

When should I choose Gemini 3.5 Flash over GPT-5 mini?

Choose Gemini 3.5 Flash when you need: (1) Large context windows over 272K tokens, (2) Tasks where Google's training gives better results, (3) Projects already using the Google ecosystem. For most cost-sensitive workloads, GPT-5 mini offers better value per dollar.

Can I mix Gemini 3.5 Flash and GPT-5 mini to optimize costs?

Yes. Use GPT-5 mini for most requests (83% cheaper input) and route long-context tasks (>272K tokens) to Gemini 3.5 Flash. This multi-model strategy can save 30-50% vs using Gemini 3.5 Flash for everything.

📊 Live Pricing

Real-time prices for all 88 models

💰 Pricing Hub

All 88 models compared — find the cheapest

Related Comparisons

5 Cheaper Gemini Alternatives →
Save 60-97% on API costs
5 Cheaper GPT-5 Alternatives →
Save 60-97% on API costs
GPT-5 mini vs Gemini Flash
OpenAI vs Google budget
GPT-5 mini vs Claude Haiku
Budget models compared
Gemini 3.5 Flash vs Mistral Large 3
Mid-tier showdown

Related Tools

Migration Checklist →
Switch providers in 5 steps
Free Pricing Widget
Embed live AI pricing on your site
Share on X LinkedIn

All Tools Are Free

No signup required to 67-model comparison, migration code snippets, PDF reports, price alerts, and cost monitoring. ✅ All tools free.

Free Tools →
This was a snapshot. What about next month?
Prices change. New models launch. Our tools catch what a one-time calculation can't — and saves you money every month.
Free Tools → 🔍 Free audit first