OpenAI
GPT-5
$0.00
per month
Input cost
Output cost
Cost per request
Requests/month
Meta (Together.ai)
Llama 4 Scout
$0.00
per month
Input cost
Output cost
Cost per request
Requests/month

Which Model for Which Use Case?

Cost Optimization

Llama 4 Scout at $0.18/M input is 86% cheaper than GPT-5. For startups watching every dollar, Llama 4 Scout delivers flagship-quality results at budget pricing.

Best value: Llama 4 Scout (86-94% cheaper)

Enterprise Reliability

GPT-5 comes with OpenAI's managed infrastructure, SLAs, and enterprise support. If uptime guarantees and dedicated support matter, GPT-5 is the safer choice.

Enterprise: GPT-5 | Budget: Llama 4 Scout

Open-Source Flexibility

Llama 4 Scout is fully open-source — you can self-host, fine-tune, and customize without vendor lock-in. GPT-5 is proprietary with API-only access.

Flexibility: Llama 4 Scout | Managed: GPT-5

Long-Context on a Budget

Llama 4 Scout offers 1M context at $0.18/M input — 3.7x more context than GPT-5 at 86% lower cost. For long-context workloads on a budget, it's unbeatable.

Long context + budget: Llama 4 Scout

Need deeper cost analysis?

APIpulse lets you compare all 88 models, save scenarios, and export PDF reports.

88 models across 10 providers
Save up to 10 scenarios
Export PDF cost reports
Optimize — save up to 40%
Free Tools →

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Llama 4 Scout cheaper than GPT-5?

Yes. Llama 4 Scout costs $0.18/M input and $0.59/M output. GPT-5 costs $1.25/M input and $10.00/M output. Llama is 86% cheaper on input and 94% cheaper on output. For 1M input + 500K output tokens/month, Llama costs $0.48 vs GPT-5's $6.25 — saving $5.77/month (92%).

Which has a larger context window, GPT-5 or Llama 4 Scout?

Llama 4 Scout has a 1M token context window, which is 3.7x larger than GPT-5's 272K context. For long-context workloads, Llama 4 Scout offers more room at a fraction of the cost.

When should I choose GPT-5 over Llama 4 Scout?

Choose GPT-5 when: (1) you need OpenAI's managed infrastructure and support, (2) you want guaranteed uptime SLAs, (3) your workload requires the highest quality reasoning. Choose Llama 4 Scout when: (1) cost is the primary concern (86-94% cheaper), (2) you can self-host or use Together.ai, (3) you want open-source flexibility.

Are GPT-5 and Llama 4 Scout good for production use?

Both support production workloads. GPT-5 is OpenAI's flagship with enterprise support. Llama 4 Scout is Meta's open-source model available via Together.ai — significantly cheaper but you manage your own deployment or rely on Together.ai's infrastructure.

📊 Live Pricing Dashboard
Real-time prices for 88 models
Savings Calculator
Find your cheapest alternatives

Related Comparisons

5 Cheaper GPT-5 Alternatives →
Save 60-97% on API costs
GPT-5 mini vs Llama 4 Scout
Budget vs Budget open-source
GPT-5 vs Claude vs Gemini
Three-way flagship comparison
GPT-5 vs Claude Sonnet 4.6
OpenAI vs Anthropic

Related Tools

Migration Checklist →
Switch providers in 5 steps
Free Pricing Widget
Embed live AI pricing on your site
🔌 Free MCP Server →
📋 Full Pricing Dashboard →
Compare all 88 models side by side
🔥 Pricing Heatmap →
Visual cost comparison across 88 models
Share on X LinkedIn

All Tools Are Free

No signup required to 67-model comparison, migration code snippets, PDF reports, price alerts, and cost monitoring. ✅ All tools free.

Free Tools →
This was a snapshot. What about next month?
Prices change. New models launch. Our tools catch what a one-time calculation can't — and saves you money every month.
Free Tools → 🔍 Free audit first